By H. William Edgar | Edgar & Dow
When a child’s interests need a separate voice in a custody case, the judge may appoint minor’s counsel under Family Code § 3150. I want parents to understand what that lawyer can do under § 3151 and how the appointment differs from an evaluator interviewing the child.
Family Code sections 3150 and 3151 govern appointment and duties in custody and visitation cases. Counsel represents the child’s best interests and must present the child’s wishes when the child so desires. The lawyer can investigate relevant facts, participate in proceedings, and protect the child’s interests. The judge remains responsible for the custody ruling.
The court can consider the complexity of the conflict, the child’s stress, allegations of abuse or neglect, and whether counsel could obtain information otherwise difficult to develop. A Family Court Services child interview serves a different function from continuing representation. A custody evaluator also has a different role. Identify what information or protection the child needs before deciding which procedure to request.
In Edgar & Dow’s practice, appointments have been seen more often in Orange and Los Angeles than in Riverside and San Bernardino. This is a practice observation, and courts in recommending counties can appoint counsel in appropriate cases. Check local rosters and procedures. California Rules of Court, rule 5.240 addresses appointment, rule 5.241 addresses compensation, and rule 5.242 addresses qualifications, rights, and responsibilities. The court sets compensation and considers the parties’ ability to pay.
In our Orange County practice, judges frequently appoint minor’s counsel in contested cases that call for independent representation of the child. Orange County maintains a list of attorneys available for appointment under local rule 712.
The judge may separately order a Child Custody Investigation through Family Court Services. An investigator gathers information and reports to the court. Minor’s counsel represents the child throughout the appointment. A case can involve both roles. See how Orange County handles custody mediation and investigations.
Los Angeles Superior Court appoints minor’s counsel in appropriate custody cases. An appointment may be considered in a prolonged dispute, when the child is under stress, or when the child’s lawyer could help bring relevant information before the court. Los Angeles may also order a One-Day or Two-Day Parenting Plan Assessment through Family Court Services. The specialist assesses custody and parenting-time issues and makes recommendations. Minor’s counsel represents the child, and both can be involved in the same case. California Rule of Court 5.240 and our Los Angeles guide to mediation and Parenting Plan Assessments.
San Diego judges can appoint minor’s counsel in appropriate custody cases. Under Local Rule 5.13.1, the court generally holds a review hearing every 90 days to consider whether the appointment should continue and whether the parties can pay. If the Family Court Services counselor needs to hear from the child during the San Diego recommending counseling process, the counselor arranges a separate interview. A child interview gives the counselor information for the case. Minor’s counsel represents the child throughout the appointment. San Diego Local Rule 5.13.1 and San Diego’s CCRC information sheet.
Ramsden v. Peterson (2022) 76 Cal.App.5th 339 held that minor’s counsel may make custody and visitation recommendations. Counsel can present admissible evidence and argue for the child’s best interests. A recommendation does not itself make otherwise inadmissible statements evidence.
Identify the child’s need for independent representation and the work counsel could perform. Under rule 5.240, the court considers factors including prolonged conflict, stress on the child, abuse or neglect allegations, and whether counsel could provide relevant information not otherwise readily available. An appointment is a judicial decision, not something one parent creates by hiring a lawyer and announcing that the lawyer represents the child.
A request should describe the existing proceedings and professionals. If an evaluator has already interviewed the family, explain what continuing representation would add. If the immediate need is a focused child interview, explain why that procedure would or would not suffice. Avoid asking for another appointment simply because an existing recommendation is unfavorable.
Where siblings’ interests may conflict, the court should consider whether separate counsel is needed. One child’s preference about a school or schedule may differ from another’s. A shared household does not guarantee that one position adequately addresses every child’s interests.
Family Code section 3151 directs counsel to represent the child’s best interests and to present the child’s wishes if the child wants them presented. Those duties can require counsel to distinguish what the child wants from the position counsel advocates. The judge considers the child’s input within the governing custody law.
A teenager does not gain the power to decide custody merely because a lawyer has been appointed. Family Code section 3042 and rule 5.250 govern participation. A child who is at least 14 and wishes to address the court generally must be permitted to do so unless the court finds that doing so would not be in the child’s best interest and states its reasons. Younger children may also be heard when appropriate.
Parents should not rehearse the child’s position or make the child responsible for proving the case. Describe concerns to your own lawyer and provide reliable information through the proper process. Read whether a child can choose where to live for the distinction between input and decision-making authority.
No. Family Code section 3151(b) provides that minor’s counsel may not be called as a witness in the proceeding. This is a major difference from a custody evaluator who may testify about an investigation and recommendations. Counsel may call witnesses, introduce admissible evidence, make objections, and argue a position.
In Ramsden v. Peterson (2022) 76 Cal.App.5th 339, the court confirmed that minor’s counsel can make recommendations. That authority does not transform counsel’s factual assertions into evidence or eliminate the ordinary rules for proving disputed facts.
If a recommendation depends on an inaccurate school record or an account of an exchange, address the underlying evidence. Your lawyer can present the actual record, question an appropriate witness, and explain the error. Demanding to put minor’s counsel on the witness stand uses the wrong procedure and distracts from the factual issue the judge needs to decide.
Section 3151 and rule 5.242 give appointed counsel rights of access to relevant child-related records and people, including educational and healthcare sources. In In re Marriage of Metzger (2014) 224 Cal.App.4th 1441, the court addressed the statutory authority to appoint counsel and obtain information needed for the representation.
Access does not mean that all information becomes public or that either parent can demand every confidential communication. The child’s lawyer may assert or waive privileges on the child’s behalf as authorized by law. Child protective services and juvenile records have additional restrictions; Family Code section 3152 provides a procedure for requesting relevant agency records.
Give your lawyer an accurate list of providers, schools, prior proceedings, and existing orders. Discuss any confidentiality concern before sending records outside the authorized process. If records are incomplete, identify what is missing and why it matters rather than assuming the other parent or the child’s lawyer already has it.
The court determines reasonable compensation and allocates responsibility under Family Code section 3153 and rule 5.241. The allocation is not automatically equal. The court must assess the parties’ ability to pay, and current financial declarations are required for that determination.
Raise affordability with financial information. Identify income, reasonably available assets, necessary expenses, and existing obligations. Ask the court to address the deposit, hourly rate, payment schedule, and any reserved reallocation. If the court finds that the parties cannot pay all or part of the cost, rule 5.241 provides for the court to pay the portion they cannot afford. That determination must come from the court.
Keep fee disputes separate from disagreement with counsel’s position. Paying a larger share does not give a parent control over the child’s representation. If your financial circumstances change, obtain advice about seeking review of the payment order rather than simply withholding payment.
Ask about the communication procedure at the outset, particularly if both parents have attorneys. Provide concise, dated information tied to the child: a new school issue, a missed exchange, a provider change, or a relevant court order. Include enough context to make the account fair and understandable.
Suppose the child has begun missing a weekly therapy appointment. Identify the dates, the provider’s schedule, the transportation provision, and what each parent proposed. That gives counsel a defined issue to investigate. Repeated messages accusing the other parent of being difficult add little without the underlying facts.
Do not ask the child to report on private conversations with counsel or act as a messenger. Explain that the lawyer has a separate role and that the adults will handle the court process. Parents can help by ensuring the child attends properly arranged meetings and by respecting any protective or communication orders.
Assume the parents disagree about a school change and give conflicting accounts of the child’s adjustment. Minor’s counsel may review school information, speak with appropriate people, and investigate the child’s needs. Counsel can then present admissible evidence and advocate a position at the hearing.
Each parent should still prepare their own case. Identify enrollment dates, educational services, transportation, and the proposed schedule. If counsel’s position rests on an assumption you dispute, supply the evidence addressing that assumption through the proper process. The appointment does not relieve either parent of the responsibility to support their requested order.
The child’s lawyer also does not gain authority to enroll the child merely by recommending a school. Read the existing legal custody provisions and obtain any necessary agreement or court ruling before implementing a change.
Read the written appointment order and any later orders defining its scope. Rule 5.240 addresses termination, substitution, and removal for good cause. A parent cannot end the appointment by declaring dissatisfaction. A specific concern about performance should be documented and raised through the appropriate court or local complaint procedure.
Distinguish a claimed error in counsel’s work from disagreement with the custody ruling. Changing lawyers does not itself change an order or extend a deadline to challenge it. Where the appointment continues over time, a review can address the remaining issues, the need for continued representation, and compensation.
Rule 5.240 on appointment of counsel for a child
Riverside County list of minor’s counsel
Orange County list of qualified minor’s counsel
Explore the California Child Custody and Visitation Library for more guides on custody evaluations and hearings.
What Happens When a Parent Claims the Other Parent Is Turning the Child Against Them?
What Happens at CCRC in Riverside and San Bernardino County?
What Happens at Confidential Child Custody Mediation in Orange County?
Child Custody Mediation in Los Angeles County: Will the Mediator Make a Recommendation?
What Is a Family Code Section 3111 Child Custody Evaluation?
Related reading. Can a Child Choose Which Parent to Live With in California?
If you are considering whether the court should appoint minor’s counsel, contact Edgar & Dow to schedule a consultation. Bring the current orders, the facts affecting your child, and the next deadline so we can assess what relief fits your case.
© Copyrights 2026 Edgar & Dow. All Rights Reserved. Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
*Images are obtained under license from Canva and other third-party stock image providers, with attribution included where required.
Digital Marketing by
